Scott Hardie | January 2, 2002
With all due respect to Michael Mann (he's the reason why I wanted to see "Ali"), he's the wrong director for the job. A biopic about this complex of a figure needs a sharp focus, literally and figuratively, and Mann is a soft-focus kind of director.

He likes to let his camera linger (and linger and linger) on the background after a scene is over, or roam around the room while the characters talk. We don't get a sense of Muhammad Ali, we get a sense of the rooms he was in. The worst it gets is with a pair of musical performances. The first is intermixed with the opening credits, as a male R&B singer flirts with his audience. The second is a little while later, as Ali dances with the woman who will become his first wife, and they leave to get it on. The female singer continues belting out her number for the camera. I liked both of the performances, but what in the fuck do they have to do with Muhammad Ali? Why do they go on for whole minutes? The camera just stays and stays on them. It's reasons like this that the movie is 2 hours and 47 minutes, when 2 hours would have been just fine.

Will Smith is good as Ali, going as far as he can into the role. Unfortunately, it's not far enough. Not once during the entire movie was I fooled into thinking that I was watching Muhammad Ali, always was I watching Will Smith playing a boxer. It was a very good impression. I can't blame Smith for this, only the casting agent, or more likely the studio exec who signed Will Smith. On the other hand, the supporting actors are all good, every one of them. Jon Voight plays Howard Cosell well (not difficult to do), and Mario Van Peebles does his best Denzel-Washington-as-Malcolm-X impression. That led me to wonder, if Spike Lee had directed this movie like he'd wanted to do, could he have talked Denzel Washington into playing a small part as Malcolm X? Also good are Giancarlo Esposito as Cassius Clay Sr. and, fun to see even in a tiny role, LeVar Burton as Dr. King.

For the first forty-five minutes or so, I thought I might be watching the first bad movie I've seen in 2001. But it slowly got tolerable, and then even, for brief moments, good. I finally rate it as a high "It was okay."


Want to participate? Please create an account a new account or log in.


Other Discussions Started by Scott Hardie

The Hardest Feat in Rock Block

When I designed the new-and-improved Rock Block, I wanted to make most of the feats easy to achieve as long as you kept playing steadily (such as "win 100 concerts"), but I also wanted to make one extra-difficult feat, something for the truly dedicated pl Go »

Parting with Partisanism

After twenty years of reading it daily, I have reached a point where I can no longer stomach The A.V. Club, the pop culture website. I have long enjoyed their humor and very good taste, and accepted that they would occasionally snark about something unhip Go »

The Controversial T

To see "Punch-Drunk Love" yesterday, my mom and I went to a new theater in Saint Petersburg. It was a nice place, obviously brand new. Go »

Fusion Filmmaking

In a conversation with Kris Weberg the other day, we agreed that "Artificial Intelligence: AI" (started by Kubrick and finished by Spielberg) had one merit for sure: It was probably the best chance we would ever get to see one of the most humanistic direc Go »

Leaderboard

There's a new page on Pirate Paradise that shows who earned the most gold recently. You can see who's doing especially well today, this week, this month, and so on, rather than just who's doing well overall. Go »

Down and Out in Kenya

In the news: "In Mombasa, Kenya, a woman was using an open-pit latrine when her cell phone slipped out of her pocket and down into the muck. Desperate to get it back, she announced that she would pay 1,000 shillings (about $13) to anyone who would dive i Go »

Go for the Gold!

Predict this year's Oscar winners and earn a prize!

20 Years of Celebrity Goos

Count down Celebrity Goo Game's 20 most influential goos on the occasion of its 20th anniversary.