Finger Food for Thought
Want to participate? Please create an account a new account or log in.
Funeratic offers games, contests, blogs, movie reviews, and more.
Need help with the site? Browse the Site Map to find any page, or contact Funeratic's owner, Scott Hardie.
Copyright © 1996-2024 Scott Hardie. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy
Funeratic is intended for adults only. Membership is free and unrestricted. Read our privacy policy.
Ready to join the fun? Create an account to get started.
Already a member? Log in.
Please use this form to log in to Funeratic with your existing account.
If you have forgotten your password, please use this form to reset it. You must provide the same email address that you used when you created your account.
If you still have trouble logging in, please contact Scott Hardie for assistance.
Welcome to Funeratic! We are an interactive community, and ask that everyone participates using their real first and last name. For more information about this, please see our privacy policy.
Your email address is required because it is the only way to reset your password if you lose it. You will never receive email from this site unless you subscribe to notifications. You will never be automatically enrolled to receive notifications.
If you need assistance with this form or have any questions, please contact Scott Hardie, the site administrator.
Funeratic contains adult language and subject matter, and is intended for adults only.
Scott Hardie | August 28, 2013
In the news: A university researcher has remotely controlled the body of another researcher, forcing him to flick a finger from across campus.
It's right for people to get excited and pass this around: It's a neat story with all kinds of science-fiction potential, good and bad. (The last paragraph of the official announcement mentions portentiously that the U.S. Army helped to fund the project.)
Here's what I'm wondering: Before this story goes any further, how is it determined that this is not a hoax? I don't believe that the university would knowingly perpetrate a fraud, nor am I accusing the two researchers of timing their movements to give the impression that they've reached a huge milestone. But given the excitement generated by this announcement and how easily it could have been faked, I would hope for some skepticism, some statements that the effect needs to be replicated by more independent researchers before any conclusions are drawn.
What do you think about this news?