Logo No Go
Want to participate? Please create an account a new account or log in.
Funeratic offers games, contests, blogs, movie reviews, and more.
Need help with the site? Browse the Site Map to find any page, or contact Funeratic's owner, Scott Hardie.
Copyright © 1996-2024 Scott Hardie. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy
Funeratic is intended for adults only. Membership is free and unrestricted. Read our privacy policy.
Ready to join the fun? Create an account to get started.
Already a member? Log in.
Please use this form to log in to Funeratic with your existing account.
If you have forgotten your password, please use this form to reset it. You must provide the same email address that you used when you created your account.
If you still have trouble logging in, please contact Scott Hardie for assistance.
Welcome to Funeratic! We are an interactive community, and ask that everyone participates using their real first and last name. For more information about this, please see our privacy policy.
Your email address is required because it is the only way to reset your password if you lose it. You will never receive email from this site unless you subscribe to notifications. You will never be automatically enrolled to receive notifications.
If you need assistance with this form or have any questions, please contact Scott Hardie, the site administrator.
Funeratic contains adult language and subject matter, and is intended for adults only.
Scott Hardie | June 28, 2015
It has become sport among certain smug designers to make fun of out-of-touch campaign logos, as the mockery of Jeb Bush's logo and mockery of Hillary Clinton's logo demonstrates. I don't understand the supposed transgressions of these logos. Yeah, they're mildly tacky. Who gives a shit? They're campaign logos; they're supposed to be serviceable, not groundbreaking. That would be like expecting a sitcom to produce highbrow art. Bush has been using the same logo throughout his entire career, and I find it charming that he's staying retro and consistent, but I guess that makes him some kind of backwards rube who doesn't understand modernity. The nitpicking over his logo goes as far as to laugh over how the J and the E are slightly too close together. Is this really important? I can't believe that anybody cares about this. I'm not a professional designer, so maybe I just can't understand, but I am a professional programmer and I can't imagine getting this worked up over how they coded their web sites. (Then again, some people have...)
Are the logos really that bad?