Monks of Atlanta
Want to participate? Please create an account a new account or log in.
Funeratic offers games, contests, blogs, movie reviews, and more.
Need help with the site? Browse the Site Map to find any page, or contact Funeratic's owner, Scott Hardie.
Copyright © 1996-2024 Scott Hardie. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy
Funeratic is intended for adults only. Membership is free and unrestricted. Read our privacy policy.
Ready to join the fun? Create an account to get started.
Already a member? Log in.
Please use this form to log in to Funeratic with your existing account.
If you have forgotten your password, please use this form to reset it. You must provide the same email address that you used when you created your account.
If you still have trouble logging in, please contact Scott Hardie for assistance.
Welcome to Funeratic! We are an interactive community, and ask that everyone participates using their real first and last name. For more information about this, please see our privacy policy.
Your email address is required because it is the only way to reset your password if you lose it. You will never receive email from this site unless you subscribe to notifications. You will never be automatically enrolled to receive notifications.
If you need assistance with this form or have any questions, please contact Scott Hardie, the site administrator.
Funeratic contains adult language and subject matter, and is intended for adults only.
Scott Hardie | October 12, 2013
The New York Times has a neat story about Tibetan monks studying science at Emory University. It's a glimpse into how hierarchical their society is, as it seems the Dalai Lama had to order them to attend over their objections, but also at how a very different and religious culture would approach concepts like half-life from a philosophical perspective. I'm glad that the scientists at Emory are also learning from the monks and treating them with dignity, as (I believe) one of the things fueling anti-intellectualism is a perceived snobbiness among scientists for refusing to consider alternative ideas even worthy of discussion. This is a neat program and would make for a great book describing what happened in more detail.