Out Order of
Lori Lancaster | April 21, 2003
[hidden by request]
Want to participate? Please create an account a new account or log in.
Lori Lancaster | April 21, 2003
[hidden by request]
Want to participate? Please create an account a new account or log in.
Funeratic offers games, contests, blogs, movie reviews, and more.
Need help with the site? Browse the Site Map to find any page, or contact Funeratic's owner, Scott Hardie.
Copyright © 1996-2024 Scott Hardie. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy
Funeratic is intended for adults only. Membership is free and unrestricted. Read our privacy policy.
Ready to join the fun? Create an account to get started.
Already a member? Log in.
Please use this form to log in to Funeratic with your existing account.
If you have forgotten your password, please use this form to reset it. You must provide the same email address that you used when you created your account.
If you still have trouble logging in, please contact Scott Hardie for assistance.
Welcome to Funeratic! We are an interactive community, and ask that everyone participates using their real first and last name. For more information about this, please see our privacy policy.
Your email address is required because it is the only way to reset your password if you lose it. You will never receive email from this site unless you subscribe to notifications. You will never be automatically enrolled to receive notifications.
If you need assistance with this form or have any questions, please contact Scott Hardie, the site administrator.
Funeratic contains adult language and subject matter, and is intended for adults only.
Scott Hardie | April 21, 2003
When you're watching for the first time a film series that was produced out of chronological order, such as "Star Wars" or the Hannibal Lector trilogy, do you prefer to watch the films in the chronological order of the plot or the order in which the films were made and released? I got to thinking of this after watching "Red Dragon" recently, and I think I prefer release order. There are minor cosmetic factors, such as Hannibal Lector looking older in 1986 than in 2002, but the main reason is that the films written and produced later are able to build on the older films, but not vice versa. Certain scenes in Star Wars Episodes I-II-III have emotional resonance because of what we know happens later in IV-V-VI, but less so the other way. There's also the fact that I try to appreciate old films in the context in which they were released, and it's tough to know the context of the prequel when you haven't seen the original.
Confusing side issue: What about a film series that jumps around in chronology, such as the "Godfather" trilogy?