Rendering History
Want to participate? Please create an account a new account or log in.
Funeratic offers games, contests, blogs, movie reviews, and more.
Need help with the site? Browse the Site Map to find any page, or contact Funeratic's owner, Scott Hardie.
Copyright © 1996-2024 Scott Hardie. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy
Funeratic is intended for adults only. Membership is free and unrestricted. Read our privacy policy.
Ready to join the fun? Create an account to get started.
Already a member? Log in.
Please use this form to log in to Funeratic with your existing account.
If you have forgotten your password, please use this form to reset it. You must provide the same email address that you used when you created your account.
If you still have trouble logging in, please contact Scott Hardie for assistance.
Welcome to Funeratic! We are an interactive community, and ask that everyone participates using their real first and last name. For more information about this, please see our privacy policy.
Your email address is required because it is the only way to reset your password if you lose it. You will never receive email from this site unless you subscribe to notifications. You will never be automatically enrolled to receive notifications.
If you need assistance with this form or have any questions, please contact Scott Hardie, the site administrator.
Funeratic contains adult language and subject matter, and is intended for adults only.
Scott Hardie | December 31, 2017
We've started watching The Crown on Netflix -- every episode of which is excellent so far -- and remarking on how much the cast looks like the real people they portray. They're close, though biology prevents them from looking exactly right.
That makes me wonder: Should technology close the gap?
CGI has already become sufficiently advanced to invent photo-realistic fictional characters and to let actors play them through motion capture, right down to minute facial movements. Should CGI be used to allow an actor to portray an exact replica of a historical figure on screen, as long as the actor is credited? Or is that too much of an encroachment on the real person's right to their own identity and image? Does it change if the person is deceased?
We've already seen it in tiny doses, like TV commercials and brief encounters in films along the lines of Forrest Gump. I'm talking about making an entire film or show about a historical figure this way, making them a main character for an hour of screen time or more.