The Others
Want to participate? Please create an account a new account or log in.
Funeratic offers games, contests, blogs, movie reviews, and more.
Need help with the site? Browse the Site Map to find any page, or contact Funeratic's owner, Scott Hardie.
Copyright © 1996-2024 Scott Hardie. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy
Funeratic is intended for adults only. Membership is free and unrestricted. Read our privacy policy.
Ready to join the fun? Create an account to get started.
Already a member? Log in.
Please use this form to log in to Funeratic with your existing account.
If you have forgotten your password, please use this form to reset it. You must provide the same email address that you used when you created your account.
If you still have trouble logging in, please contact Scott Hardie for assistance.
Welcome to Funeratic! We are an interactive community, and ask that everyone participates using their real first and last name. For more information about this, please see our privacy policy.
Your email address is required because it is the only way to reset your password if you lose it. You will never receive email from this site unless you subscribe to notifications. You will never be automatically enrolled to receive notifications.
If you need assistance with this form or have any questions, please contact Scott Hardie, the site administrator.
Funeratic contains adult language and subject matter, and is intended for adults only.
Scott Hardie | August 19, 2001
Last night I saw "The Others" with a whole shitload of people. It was good. It was a ghost story, and it was scary, but it didn't resort to having things jump out at the audience (see "What Lies Beneath") to scare you. Instead, it used a little filmmaking technique known as "tone."
It's also skimpy on special effects, having only one shot that was obviously computer-animated. (Nicole Kidman gets lost in fog at one point, though, and the fog was probably also done that way.) Between the lack of jump scenes and the lack of showy special effects, and a definite lack of ironic self-awareness, I'd have to agree with critics that this is a very old-fashioned ghost story. There is, I suppose, one trendy horror movie technique that is used, but it relates to the ending, so I won't dare say it. :-)
I strongly recommend this movie. If you know me, you know that my second-favorite kind of movie (after martial arts movies) are ghost stories, preferably set in a haunted house. I can't think of one that I despise. Granted that, this film is still particularly well-made, trapping its small cast in a beautiful but confined space and slowly winding up the tension. I will warn you, however, that it proceeds at a very slow pace. People who don't like this movie were perhaps trained by movies like "The Haunting" of two years ago, where there's some ghostly occurrence every five minutes or less. In this film, it's a fourth that rate, but the scenes in between are often tense and creepy.
Nicole Kidman is very good, but I wouldn't call it the best performance of her career. (That would have to be Dr. Chase Meridan from "Batman Forever.") The two child actors are also quite talented. The sets are beautiful: They're no competition for 1999's "The Haunting," but they're not supposed to be on that grand scale, either. There's also some dry humor, reminding us that characters in this kind of situation keep their sanity by cracking jokes. My only real complaint is that the story is not satisfactorily explained. For instance, the character who comes into the film halfway through and then leaves a few scenes later is not explained very well. You can make guesses based on what the character says, but that's not enough. I love guessing at the meaning of a film, but not at the plot elements.
As Kelly tried to get up and take me with her at the end of the credits, I couldn't resist: "This theater is ours, and no one can make us leave."