We've Got Movie Sign
Want to participate? Please create an account a new account or log in.
Funeratic offers games, contests, blogs, movie reviews, and more.
Need help with the site? Browse the Site Map to find any page, or contact Funeratic's owner, Scott Hardie.
Copyright © 1996-2024 Scott Hardie. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy
Funeratic is intended for adults only. Membership is free and unrestricted. Read our privacy policy.
Ready to join the fun? Create an account to get started.
Already a member? Log in.
Please use this form to log in to Funeratic with your existing account.
If you have forgotten your password, please use this form to reset it. You must provide the same email address that you used when you created your account.
If you still have trouble logging in, please contact Scott Hardie for assistance.
Welcome to Funeratic! We are an interactive community, and ask that everyone participates using their real first and last name. For more information about this, please see our privacy policy.
Your email address is required because it is the only way to reset your password if you lose it. You will never receive email from this site unless you subscribe to notifications. You will never be automatically enrolled to receive notifications.
If you need assistance with this form or have any questions, please contact Scott Hardie, the site administrator.
Funeratic contains adult language and subject matter, and is intended for adults only.
Scott Hardie | June 10, 2002
I saw three movies in the past three days, and here are some brief comments about them.
"Big Trouble" - Funny, but short. The big action climax started at about the halfway point. I had trouble figuring out who the lead character was - Tim Allen? Jason Lee? Stanley Tucci? Tom Sizemore? They all seem to have about equal screen time and equal plot importance. Whatever. I recommend this movie, but don't expect greatness. Just expect to have a good 85 minutes.
"A Beautiful Mind" - I saw this for the second time and appreciated it more. I already knew what Ron Howard did wrong, so instead I paid attention to what he did right, and I was impressed. The way the tension slowly rises, the way the mystery is established, the way the tone and setting are established with second unit photography. I still feel the opposite of Matt (Connelly was great and Harris was mediocre), but I was much more into the movie the second time. I wish I could see it with someone who didn't know what Nash's disease was.
"The Sum of All Fears" - The was a good movie, and well-crafted, but not quite as good or well-crafted as many movies in this genre. You can make a thriller that's airtight and has ten layers of tension, and this one was airtight with about three layers of tension. I would think the verge of nuclear war would be a little more tense. Good acting from the supporting players, less so from the leads. My biggest complaint is that it was missing stuff - the last act of the movie seemed to be missing connecting scenes that helped us piece the plot together. [Major spoiler: I also complain about the execution of the three villains at the end of the movie. Why were they not brought to justice instead?]