Scott Hardie | June 6, 2003
The American Film Institute really likes Top-100 lists. They release a new one each year with the goal of getting people talking about cinema, and I'm happy to oblige. Their latest list is the greatest heroes and villains in American film history. What do you make of the results? Any major omissions?

Lori Lancaster | June 6, 2003
[hidden by request]

Scott Hardie | June 9, 2003
I disagree with a few of their choices only because they're too recent, for instance #50 on both lists. Show me how either one demonstrates cultural impact or legacy? As their replacements I suggest Jim Stark from "Rebel Without a Cause" as hero and John Doe from "Se7en" as villain, both of which have inspired numerous imitations in subsequent films.

Jackie Mason | June 9, 2003
[hidden by request]

Matthew Preston | June 14, 2003
The SOL in this case stands for "Statute of Limitations."
In recent discussions of movies with friends and co-workers, I have found that most people do not keep their conversations spoiler-free when in ear shot of others. It got me to thinking about at what point in time is it okay to discuss a film in front of others with spoilers? A statute of limitations so to speak, on the timeframe that a movie has been in release before it is okay to reveal the ending, major plot points, etc.
Personally, I will only reveal spoilers from movies that have been out for years, or of classics that you must be a shut in to not have seen or heard about at this point. At work, we have come to the consensus that if a movie has made it's release to DVD or video, it is now safe to discuss. Any other thoughts?

Scott Hardie | June 14, 2003
I'll let other people answer the question before me, but I want to mention that one of my worst moviegoing memories was coming out the theater after seeing "The Others." The rest of my friends wanted to stop for a smoke break before we left, so we stood right in front of the theater, and naturally we started talking about the movie. They stood right there at the theater entrance, loudly discussing the big surprise at the end of the movie, while people were walking in for the next show and glaring at them. I felt so sorry and I finally convinced my friends to move away from the theater while they continued their conversation. I think Kelly was the only other one who noticed.

Anna Gregoline | June 15, 2003
Yeah that movie was ruined for me long before I saw it. Oh well.

Jackie Mason | June 15, 2003
[hidden by request]

Want to participate? Please create an account a new account or log in.

Other Discussions Started by Scott Hardie

Gamecube vs. Playstation 2

Having had both systems for about ten days now, I'm surprised to say that I much prefer the Gamecube. Go »

With Clarity and Conviction

I don't know if I'll have time to comment on the other discussions tonight ... I just now got home from work :-( . Go »

Catch and Kill Me

Does anyone else find Ronan Farrow mildly annoying like I do? I keep seeing stories like this and this and this about the allegations in his new book about his #MeToo reporting and how proud he is to be a champion for women. Go »

Glenn Beck

I have no problem with Glenn Beck's message. There are parts that I agree with and others that I disagree with, but whatever, it's fine. Go »

Trouble in the Garden State

The New Jersey state legislature is up in arms over whether the tomato can be declared the official state vegetable, since it is in fact a fruit. Go »

The Saliva Sentence

An Oklahoma man was arrested on suspicion of beating his wife, for which he probably would have been sentenced to a year in prison and a $3000 fine. Go »