Angel Eyes
Matthew Preston | March 13, 2002
I am glad to read that you liked it. It didn't do so well in theaters and everyone I've talked to that has seen it was dissapointed. I saw it the day it came out without having seen any trailers and I thought it was fantastic. I hope others can enjoy it too.
Scott Hardie | March 14, 2002
If you did a "Ten Best Films of 2001" list, would "Angel Eyes" be on it? I've found in my three years of writing lists that there are always 1-2 movies on mine that nobody else seemed to like at all. Taste is all subjective. Directors rarely think they're making bad movies.
Jackie Mason | March 15, 2002
[hidden by request]
Want to participate? Please create an account a new account or log in.
Other Discussions Started by Scott Hardie
Roving Captions
Provide a caption for this news photo about Karl Rove's resignation: Go »The Upside of Spam
I hate spam as much as, well, everybody, but occasionally it's funny. Like this particular message. From: "Elga" Reply-To: elga_vouieses_beligt@yahoo. Go »Junking Junk Mail
Spam email, I can filter out more than 99.9% of the time. Telemarketing calls are no longer an issue thanks to that wonderful DNC list. Go »Old Stuff
I really wish you could control whether or not web search engines added your pages to their listings. Go »Vaseline
Enjoying Elastica's musical tribute to Vaseline the other day got me wondering about other songs that immortalize commercial products, especially brand names. Go »
Scott Hardie | March 13, 2002
Not much to say about this movie that I didn't say in my Thorough Movie Review. It was good. There is a romance, but that, to me, is not the real point of the film. Also, if you've seen the trailers, and you think you know the ending - you don't. At least, that's the way it was for me. I could explain that more, but I don't want to give spoilers. Go rent this movie. It's not a bad use of two hours.