Scott Hardie | November 18, 2001
Am I the only person annoyed by these? I doubt it. They started with those insulting X-10 camera ads with the nubile young models looking eagerly at the camera (which would defeat the point of a "secret" camera anyway). Now they're all over the place - MSNBC, Yahoo, IMDb, Amazon. And lots more products and services are being offered, none of them worth anyone's attention. What the fuck? Truly, I wouldn't care about them, but they don't work like they're supposed to. The whole thing that supposed to be great about them is that they pop "under" instead of over, so that you don't notice them until you're done web-surfing. But if you are in Window A and start loading a web site, then switch to Window B to read something else while it loads, out of nowhere Window A will pop up and an ad will appear beneath it. The window has to be on top for the ad to appear beneath it. Like with the other two posts today, I'm just venting about something that I shouldn't let bother me, but I'm getting rather annoyed by these things.

D. R. | November 19, 2001
[hidden by author request]

Scott Hardie | November 19, 2001
Thank you, Casper. You've saved my web-surfing!

D. R. | November 21, 2001
[hidden by author request]

Matthew Preston | November 23, 2001
For IE users :

I have always used a little trick that I learned a while back.

Open IE, click on tools, then internet options. (older versions of IE may have the internet options selection under view).

Choose the security tab, then click on restricted sites and click on the sites button. Enter the url of any site that has a pop-up or pop-under add.

You can't get rid of all of the annoying adds, but if there are certain sites that you visit often and are ticking you off, just try this.

Scott Hardie | November 23, 2001
Cool, I never thought about that. I always thought that if I put a site in the restricted zone, I wouldn't be able to access it at all. Thanks for the idea.


Want to participate? Please create an account a new account or log in.


Other Discussions Started by Scott Hardie

That Explains L33t

Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteers are in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit Go »

Confederate Flag T-Shirts

According to the Washington Post, there's a controversy going on in several Georgia schools who have banned the Confederate flag on T-shirts. (link) Those against the shirts say that they generate complaints (albeit few) and disrupt order in the school, a Go »

Mr. and Ms. Restaurant

Imagine restaurant chains—fast food, fast casual, or table service—personified as living human beings. How do you picture them? Go into as much or as little detail as you like. Go »

The New Master

More comments coming as soon as I can write them – but can I take a moment right now to congratulate Denise on becoming the new Goo Master (highest all-time score)? (link) Just as I was shocked when someone finally overtook Matthew's seemingly-eternal t Go »

Zombified

When the Spring 2012 season begins on Monday, there will be several small rule changes that might wind up having a big effect on Celebrity Goo Game. The foremost change is that "zombie players" will rise to compete again. Go »

The Final Frontier of Prank Television

Is it just me, or is prank tv getting meaner as it gets more successful? Today the London Times reported (link) on a new British "reality" series that will follow nine contest winners as they undergo weeks of preparation in a Soviet cosmonaut training fac Go »

Happy anniversary!

Erik Bates joined Funeratic 16 years ago today.