Jackie Mason | December 18, 2003
[hidden by request]
Lori Lancaster | December 19, 2003
[hidden by request]
Jackie Mason | December 21, 2003
[hidden by request]
Erik Bates | December 23, 2003
[hidden by request]
Want to participate? Please create an account a new account or log in.
Top Ten Commenters
8946 comments
3543 comments
3332 comments
2943 comments
2261 comments
2260 comments
1927 comments
1464 comments
1295 comments
1295 comments
Funeratic offers games, contests, blogs, movie reviews, and more.
Need help with the site? Browse the Site Map to find any page, or contact Funeratic's owner, Scott Hardie.
Copyright © 1996-2024 Scott Hardie. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy
Funeratic is intended for adults only. Membership is free and unrestricted. Read our privacy policy.
Ready to join the fun? Create an account to get started.
Already a member? Log in.
Scott Hardie | December 18, 2003
I've said most of what I wanted to say in my TMR. I thought this was the best film in the trilogy, marginally better than the first because it was able to build on what had come before instead of being saddled with the task of setting everything up. To me, the second film was by far the weakest, because it sidelined the hobbits to highlight the generic peasant people of Rohan, who I could not possibly care less about. This film, with its renewed emphasis on the hobbits, was the masterpiece finish promised when the series started.
So now, I want to know what you think. Certainly just about everybody here will see it in the next week or so. Post a comment or two. (And if you haven't seen it, avoid the comments below if you're sensitive about spoilers.)