Yes . . . Yes . . . Yes
Jeff Flom | June 5, 2003
Someone forgot to tell AT&T that the concept of Caveat Emptor was dead; oh, no, that's right, they just don't care.
Want to participate? Please create an account a new account or log in.
Jeff Flom | June 5, 2003
Someone forgot to tell AT&T that the concept of Caveat Emptor was dead; oh, no, that's right, they just don't care.
Want to participate? Please create an account a new account or log in.
Funeratic offers games, contests, blogs, movie reviews, and more.
Need help with the site? Browse the Site Map to find any page, or contact Funeratic's owner, Scott Hardie.
Copyright © 1996-2024 Scott Hardie. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy
Funeratic is intended for adults only. Membership is free and unrestricted. Read our privacy policy.
Ready to join the fun? Create an account to get started.
Already a member? Log in.
Scott Hardie | June 4, 2003
So I read through this entire article about phone thieves reprogramming victims' voicemail accounts to activate collect calls to distant nations, racking up tens of thousands of dollars in bills for the victims, which AT&T is insisting that they pay. If I was a victim, sure I'd be worried about having to pay the money (AT&T will probably waive it in the end), but you know what would also concern me? That the bastards who did it be captured, since we know the number from which they made the call. (You don't make 95 hours in calls from a pay phone.) Comments?