Objection!
Want to participate? Please create an account a new account or log in.
Funeratic offers games, contests, blogs, movie reviews, and more.
Need help with the site? Browse the Site Map to find any page, or contact Funeratic's owner, Scott Hardie.
Copyright © 1996-2024 Scott Hardie. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy
Funeratic is intended for adults only. Membership is free and unrestricted. Read our privacy policy.
Ready to join the fun? Create an account to get started.
Already a member? Log in.
Please use this form to log in to Funeratic with your existing account.
If you have forgotten your password, please use this form to reset it. You must provide the same email address that you used when you created your account.
If you still have trouble logging in, please contact Scott Hardie for assistance.
Welcome to Funeratic! We are an interactive community, and ask that everyone participates using their real first and last name. For more information about this, please see our privacy policy.
Your email address is required because it is the only way to reset your password if you lose it. You will never receive email from this site unless you subscribe to notifications. You will never be automatically enrolled to receive notifications.
If you need assistance with this form or have any questions, please contact Scott Hardie, the site administrator.
Funeratic contains adult language and subject matter, and is intended for adults only.
Scott Hardie | July 18, 2012
Trial lawyers around here, and anyone familiar with the law in general: I'm still watching Law & Order: Special Victims Unit. Like every TV courtroom drama, the trial dialogue is punctuated by shouts of "objection!" on a frequent basis. I've never observed a real trial, so I have no idea how realistic that is (I doubt much), but that's not really what I wonder about.
After seeing it so many times, I noticed that on TV, the judge never rules that an attorney's behavior is inappropriate until that "objection!" rings out. One attorney could be completely out of line, badgering a witness or testifying themselves or whatever, and the judge sits there silent until the opposing attorney objects. Is that an accurate portrayal of how it works in real life? I thought the role of the judge was to kept proceedings fair and legal, so why doesn't the judge step in sooner to stop that kind of behavior? Do certain objections by their nature have to be raised by counsel? Or is this just a case of the TV industry loving the word "objection!" so much that they downplay the role of the judge to allow it to be shouted more often?