Scott Hardie | June 27, 2004
If you had to choose one, would you go blind for one day or deaf for one week?

Jackie Mason | June 27, 2004
[hidden by author request]

Steve West | June 27, 2004
Helen Keller said, "My vision loss isolates me from things. My hearing loss isolates me from people."

Steve Dunn | June 27, 2004
Blind for a day!

Lori Lancaster | June 28, 2004
[hidden by author request]

Denise Sawicki | June 28, 2004
Blind for a day. It's only a day! I could skip work and listen to music all day.

Anna Gregoline | June 28, 2004
Deaf for a week.

Erik Bates | June 29, 2004
I'm with Hellen Keller here. While not being able to see would be terrible, I would much rather be able to hear. I'm a 'people person' and I can't do that too well without being able to hear and speak.

Scott Hardie | June 29, 2004
I'm tempted to say "blind for a day" for the same reason as Denise, to get it over with quickly. But that's the thing: If I were blind for a day, I'd call in sick, lock myself in my apartment, and try to make it through the day without breaking something. That doesn't really teach me what it's like to be blind. However, if I were deaf for a week, I'd have to venture out into the world, and live as a deaf person for one week. That would be of greater benefit in the long run. Then again, it's impossible via this hypothetical scenario to get the experience of being deaf or blind for life, because that would mean never knowing what colors looked like or how voices sounded, that sort of thing. Anyway, I just thought I'd toss this one out there.

Erik Bates | June 29, 2004
Reminds me of that discussion we had a while back about how hard it would be to describe "blue" to a blind person who has no concept of color.

Steve West | June 29, 2004
An interesting question to me is this: Is it worse to be blind and to never have experienced "blue" or to go blind later in life and know that that you will never see blue again (outside of memory and mind's eye)?

Scott Hardie | June 29, 2004
'Tis better to have seen and lost.

Steve West | June 29, 2004
I'm not so sure. Igorance being bliss, you know.

Melissa Erin | June 30, 2004
[hidden by author request]

Steve Dunn | June 30, 2004
A person who lost his or her sight would have a sense of loss or limitation that you would not have if you were blind all your life. I don't think people born blind are ever inconvenienced by their blindness.


Want to participate? Please create an account a new account or log in.


Other Discussions Started by Scott Hardie

Links R Us

Well, we all knew it was coming. I've created a page of miscellaneous links. Go »

A Different Pepsi Challenge

Do any soda-drinkers here refuse to drink the caffeine-free varieties? I have known a number of people who defiantly take that stance, and it always baffles me. Go »

Ordinary Machine

It was over a year ago that I first griped about how long it was taking Sony to publish Fiona Apple's new album. (link) Jon Brion produced the album in his usual eclectic style, incorporating dozens of unusual instruments, and the work was far too dense t Go »

Star Trek: The Other Motion Picture

Anybody like it? Dislike it? Go »

Executioner's Song and Dance

The Supreme Court has ruled that child rape cannot be punished by execution. Nobody argues that it isn't among the most vile and heinous of crimes, but we don't decide punishment by how offensive we find the crime. Go »

Plus ça change...

When I first saw the poster for The Change-Up, it sounded like a reasonable idea for a movie: Bachelor and new daddy discuss each others' lives and think the grass is greener on the other side, then agree to trade places for a while, then learn something Go »